From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex rel. Velez v. Russo

Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
Jun 23, 2014
2014 Ohio 2779 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 101332

06-23-2014

STAT EEX REL., PEDRO R. VELEZ RELATOR v. HONORABLE JOSEPH RUSSO RESPONDENT

FOR RELATOR Pedro R. Velez Inmate No. 651-114 Trumbull Correctional Institution ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor By: James E. Moss Assistant County Prosecutor


JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION


JUDGMENT:

WRIT DENIED


Writ of Mandamus

Order No. 475757

Motion No. 475325

FOR RELATOR

Pedro R. Velez
Inmate No. 651-114
Trumbull Correctional Institution

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT

Timothy J. McGinty
Cuyahoga County Prosecutor
By: James E. Moss
Assistant County Prosecutor
TIM McCORMACK, J.:

{¶1} Pedro R. Velez has filed a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Velez seeks an order from this court that requires Judge Joseph D. Russo to render a ruling with regard to a motion for jail-time credit that was filed in State v. Velez, Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-573694.

{¶2} Attached to Judge Russo's motion for summary judgment is a copy of a judgment entry, journalized on May 29, 2014, which demonstrates that a ruling has been rendered with regard to Velez's motion for jail-time credit. Thus, the complaint for a writ of mandamus is moot. State ex rel. Jerninghan v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 74 Ohio St.3d 278, 658 N.E.2d 723 (1996); State ex rel. Gantt v. Coleman, 6 Ohio St.3d 5, 450 N.E.2d 1163 (1983).

{¶3} It must also be noted that Velez's complaint for a writ of mandamus did not contain: (1) a sworn affidavit, that specified the details of his claim, as required by Loc.App.R. 45(B)(1)(a); (2) an affidavit that specified each civil action or appeal of a civil action filed within the last five years, as required by R.C. 2969.25(A); and (3) statements that sets forth the balance in his account for the preceding six months and also set forth all other owned cash and things of value, as required by R.C. 2969.25(C). The failure to comply with the requirements of Loc.App.R. 45(B)(1)(a), R.C. 2969.25(A), and 2969.25(C) warrants dismissal of Velez's complaint for a writ of mandamus. See State ex rel. Washington v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 87 Ohio St.3d 258, 719 N.E.2d 544 (1999); State ex rel. Jones v. McGinty, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 92602, 2009-Ohio-1258; State ex rel. Hightower v. Russo, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 82321, 2003-Ohio-3679.

{¶4} Accordingly, we grant Judge Russo's motion for summary judgment. Costs to Judge Russo. Costs waived. The court directs the clerk of court to serve all parties with notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal as required by Civ.R. 58(B).

{¶5} Writ denied. __________
TIM McCORMACK, JUDGE
SEAN C. GALLAGHER, P.J., and
MELODY J. STEWART, J., CONCUR


Summaries of

State ex rel. Velez v. Russo

Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
Jun 23, 2014
2014 Ohio 2779 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

State ex rel. Velez v. Russo

Case Details

Full title:STAT EEX REL., PEDRO R. VELEZ RELATOR v. HONORABLE JOSEPH RUSSO RESPONDENT

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

Date published: Jun 23, 2014

Citations

2014 Ohio 2779 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014)