From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State, ex Rel. v. Village of Manchester

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 15, 1944
53 N.E.2d 912 (Ohio 1944)

Opinion

No. 29880

Decided March 15, 1944.

Mandamus — Respondents in default for answer and peremptory writ issued — Levy of tax to pay judgment against village for waterworks service.

IN MANDAMUS.

Messrs. Peck, Shaffer Williams and Mr. O.E. Young, for relator.


This cause coming on to be heard on the return of the alternative writ of mandamus heretofore issued herein, and no answer having been made by said defendants, or either of them, the court find the facts to be, as set forth in the petition, and that the relator is entitled to have said writ made peremptory.

It is therefore ordered that a peremptory writ of mandamus issue against said defendants, and each of them, to wit: The village of Manchester, Adams county, Ohio, Charles Young, mayor of said village, Harmon Holderness, as clerk of said village, Martin Messer, Myron Frame, D.P. Stone, Bruce Bell, William Chandler and Alma Stone, as members of the council of said village, for the performance of the acts theretofore alternatively ordered, to wit: It is now ordered that said respondents forthwith provide by proper and appropriate legislation for levy of a tax upon all of the taxable property in the said village of Manchester, Ohio, within the ten-mill constitutional tax limitation sufficient in amount to pay the interest and such part of the principal of relator's judgment as may be paid from the proceeds thereof, and that they cause a certified copy of said legislation to be sent to the auditor of Adams county, Ohio, and that said tax be levied from year to year prior to and in preference to all other items, except that levied for principal and interest on unvoted bonds, which are now outstanding and that respondents segregate said tax from all other funds of said village, and pay the same over to the relator as it is collected to be applied first upon the interest and then upon the principal of relator's said judgment. It is further ordered that the respondents pay the costs herein taxed at $......, for which execution is awarded.

Peremptory writ allowed by default.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, BELL, WILLIAMS and TURNER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State, ex Rel. v. Village of Manchester

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 15, 1944
53 N.E.2d 912 (Ohio 1944)
Case details for

State, ex Rel. v. Village of Manchester

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE, EX REL. BAXTER, TRUSTEE v. VILLAGE OF MANCHESTER ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Mar 15, 1944

Citations

53 N.E.2d 912 (Ohio 1944)
53 N.E.2d 912

Citing Cases

State, ex Rel. Spirko v. Court of Appeals

See State, ex rel. Temke, v. Outcalt (1977), 49 Ohio St.2d 189, 190 [3 O.O.3d 248]. Where no answer or other…

State, ex Rel. Woodbury, v. Spitler

Appellants would have us hold that an answer must be made in written form prior to commencement of the…