From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State, ex Rel. v. Eyrich

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 24, 1951
96 N.E.2d 412 (Ohio 1951)

Opinion

No. 32438

Decided January 24, 1951.

Prohibition — Not available to prevent ministerial act — Elections — Use of absent voter's ballots.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton county.

Mr. George S. Hawke, for appellant.

Mr. Carson Hoy, prosecuting attorney, Mr. C. Watson Hover and Mr. Carl B. Rubin, for appellees.


This proceeding is in this court on appeal from a judgment of the Court of Appeals sustaining a demurrer to and dismissing a petition in prohibition filed originally in that court to prevent the board of elections from using certain "absent voter's ballots" which were not "printed and ready for use thirty days before the date of the election," as required by Section 4785-113, General Code. After the demurrer was sustained, the relator declined to plead further.

The extraordinary remedy of prohibition is not available to prevent the performance of a purely ministerial act.

The judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, MIDDLETON, TAFT, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State, ex Rel. v. Eyrich

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 24, 1951
96 N.E.2d 412 (Ohio 1951)
Case details for

State, ex Rel. v. Eyrich

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE, EX REL. MEURER, APPELLANT v. EYRICH, JR., ET AL., HAMILTON…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jan 24, 1951

Citations

96 N.E.2d 412 (Ohio 1951)
96 N.E.2d 412

Citing Cases

Waxler v. Smith

The act of the defendant constable, sought to be prohibited, is a ministerial act. The extraordinary remedy…

State ex Rel. v. Plan. Com

The allegation that the respondent commission "has requested the prosecuting attorney of Franklin county Ohio…