From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. v. Board

Supreme Court of Ohio
Nov 28, 1962
186 N.E.2d 476 (Ohio 1962)

Opinion

No. 37891

Decided November 28, 1962.

Soldiers' Relief Commission — Determination of funds required — County commissioners' duty to levy, mandatory — Section 5901.11, Revised Code.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Mahoning County.

By this action in mandamus instituted in the Court of Appeals, the relators, constituting the Soldiers' Relief Commission of Mahoning County, seek to compel the respondent, Board of County Commissioners, to appropriate the amount of relief relators certified they needed to perform the functions of the commission for the year 1962.

The Court of Appeals allowed the writ.

An appeal as of right brings the cause to this court for review.

Mr. Samuel E. Karam, for appellees.

Mr. Thomas A. Beil, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Robert M. McCracken, for appellant.


The only issue presented is whether the respondent, Board of County Commissioners, is compelled to appropriate and give to the Soldiers' Relief Commission the amount of money the commission certified it needed, which amount Section 5901.11, Revised Code, requires the board to raise by levy.

Section 5901.11, Revised Code, provides that the Soldiers' Relief Commission shall determine and certify to the Board of County Commissioners the probable amount necessary for the aid and relief of indigent persons for the ensuing year, and that the Board of County Commissioners " shall make the necessary levy," not to exceed five-tenths of a mill per dollar on the assessed value of the property of the county. This and related sections of the Code make it a mandatory duty of the Board of County Commissioners to provide the sum certified for the use of the Soldiers' Relief Commission.

No question has been raised that the statutory provisions were not followed. The evidence affirmatively shows that the relators determined, in the prescribed way, the probable amount necessary for the purposes required by law, and, in a proper manner, certified the same to the respondent board.

Therefore, under the clear language of the statute, the writ of mandamus must be allowed, and the judgment of the Court of Appeals is, therefore, affirmed.

Any hardship which may be imposed on the various county departments by reason of the mandatory nature of the law can be eliminated only by the General Assembly.

Judgment affirmed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, TAFT, MATTHIAS, CRAWFORD and O'NEILL, JJ., concur.

GRIFFITH, J., not participating.

CRAWFORD, J., of the Second Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of HERBERT, J.


Summaries of

State ex Rel. v. Board

Supreme Court of Ohio
Nov 28, 1962
186 N.E.2d 476 (Ohio 1962)
Case details for

State ex Rel. v. Board

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE EX REL., BINDER ET AL., SOLDIERS' RELIEF COMMISSION OF MAHONING…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Nov 28, 1962

Citations

186 N.E.2d 476 (Ohio 1962)
186 N.E.2d 476

Citing Cases

Lynch v. Gallia Cty. Bd. of Commrs

In 1962, this court interpreted this version of R.C. 5901.11 and held that boards of county commissioners had…

State v. Bd. of County Commrs. of Meigs

Many more cases could be cited for this proposition.Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Mental Retardation v. Cuyahoga Cty.…