Opinion
No. 26277
Decided December 16, 1936.
Supreme Court — Dismissals — No debatable constitutional question involved — Ordinance providing for replacement of equipment in municipally — owned utility — Referendum petition filed with mayor under Section 5, Article XVIII, Constitution — Referendum permissible only under Section 4227-2, et seq., General Code.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals of Sandusky county.
Mr. Harry E. Garn, for appellant.
Messrs. Bracy Young, for appellees.
It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., STEPHENSON, WILLIAMS, JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.