From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. Tomasic v. City of Kansas City

Supreme Court of Kansas
Apr 22, 1985
698 P.2d 382 (Kan. 1985)

Opinion

No. 57,951

Opinion filed April 22, 1985.

TAXATION — Exempt Property — Constitutionality of Statute Which Exempts Property Constructed or Purchased with Industrial Revenue Bonds.

Original action in quo warranto. Opinion filed April 22, 1985. Judgment for respondents.

Nick A. Tomasic, district attorney, argued the cause and was on the brief for the relator.

Robert J. Watson, city attorney, argued the cause for the respondents, and Jody Boeding, assistant city attorney, Norman E. Gaar, of Gaar Bell, of Overland Park, Patricia K. Hirsch, of the same firm, and John F. Steineger, Jr., of Kansas City, were with him on the brief for respondent Kansas City, Kansas, and John P. Biscanin, of Kansas City, was with him on the brief for the respondent City of Kansas City, Kansas, Wyandotte County Joint Port Authority.


The opinion of the court was delivered by


This is an original action in quo warranto brought by Nick A. Tomasic, Wyandotte County District Attorney, (relator) challenging the constitutionality of K.S.A. 79-201a Second, as amended, and challenging the legality of certain actions taken or proposed to be taken by the City of Kansas City, Kansas, and the City of Kansas City, Kansas-Wyandotte County Joint Port Authority (respondents) under an inducement agreement with General Motors Corporation (GM).

Due to the urgency of the matter and public interest involved, this action was given a preferential setting in our court. The case has been briefed thoroughly by the parties and was argued on April 2, 1985.

After examining the record and giving the matter due consideration we hold judgment shall be entered for the respondents. The court finds that K.S.A. 79-201a Second does not violate the Kansas Constitution or the United States Constitution in any of the particulars charged by the relator, and the challenged actions taken or proposed to be taken by the respondents are legal.

This brief opinion announcing the decision of the court will be supplemented by a formal opinion to be filed when it is prepared.

LOCKETT, J., concurring.

HERD, J., dissenting.


Summaries of

State ex Rel. Tomasic v. City of Kansas City

Supreme Court of Kansas
Apr 22, 1985
698 P.2d 382 (Kan. 1985)
Case details for

State ex Rel. Tomasic v. City of Kansas City

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF KANSAS, ex rel., Nick A. Tomasic, Wyandotte County District…

Court:Supreme Court of Kansas

Date published: Apr 22, 1985

Citations

698 P.2d 382 (Kan. 1985)
698 P.2d 382

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Tomasic v. City of Kansas City

This case has been briefed thoroughly by the parties and was argued on April 2, 1985. This opinion…