From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex rel. Tingler v. Franklin Cty. Prosecutor's Office

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Mar 2, 2023
169 Ohio St. 3d 1451 (Ohio 2023)

Opinion

2022-1624

03-02-2023

STATE EX REL. TINGLER v. FRANKLIN CTY. PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE


CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS

In Mandamus. Sua sponte, relator, Charles Tingler, found to be a vexatious litigator under S.Ct.Prac.R. 4.03(B). Accordingly, Charles Tingler prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first obtaining leave. Any request for leave shall be submitted to the clerk of this court for the court's review. Respondents’ motions to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed.

Kennedy, C.J., and DeWine, Donnelly, Stewart, Brunner, and Deters, JJ., concur.

Fischer, J., concurs for the reasons stated in his concurring opinion in State ex rel. Tingler v. Franklin Cty. Prosecutor's Office, 169 Ohio St.3d 1449, 2023-Ohio-640, 204 N.E.3d 552.


Summaries of

State ex rel. Tingler v. Franklin Cty. Prosecutor's Office

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Mar 2, 2023
169 Ohio St. 3d 1451 (Ohio 2023)
Case details for

State ex rel. Tingler v. Franklin Cty. Prosecutor's Office

Case Details

Full title:STATE EX REL. TINGLER v. FRANKLIN CTY. PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio.

Date published: Mar 2, 2023

Citations

169 Ohio St. 3d 1451 (Ohio 2023)
204 N.E.3d 552
204 N.E.3d 554

Citing Cases

Bibb v. U.S. Steel

{¶ 13} Today and in the past, this court has imposed filing restrictions on relators, ordering them to be…

Bibb v. St. Med. Bd.

{¶ 13} Today and in the past, this court has imposed filing restrictions on relators, ordering them to be…