From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. Tidline v. Hickerson

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1875
72 N.C. 421 (N.C. 1875)

Opinion

January Term, 1875.

Depositions are admissible in evidence on the trial of an issue in Bastardy, as they are in other civil cases.

( Pate's case, Busb. 244; State v. McIntosh, 64 N.C. 607, cited and approved.)

PROCEEDING IN BASTARDY, tried at Fall Term, 1874, of WILKES Superior Court, before his Honor, Mitchell, J.

On the trial of an issue as to the paternity of the child, the defendant offered in evidence the deposition of a witness who was too sick to attend the Court. The reading of the deposition was objected to by the Solicitor, which objection was sustained by the Court.

There was a verdict against the defendant. Judgment and appeal.

Scott Caldwell, for defendant.

Attorney General Hargrove, for the State.


We are not informed by the record for what reason his Honor rejected the deposition offered in evidence by the defendant. It is said here it was because he considered the proceeding a criminal one, in which depositions are not admitted. That a proceeding in bastardy in a civil action is settled by the cases of State v. Pate, 1 Busb. 244, and State v. McIntosh, 64 N.C. 607. The deposition was admissible.

PER CURIAM. Judgment below reversed and venire de novo. Let this opinion be certified.


Summaries of

State ex Rel. Tidline v. Hickerson

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1875
72 N.C. 421 (N.C. 1875)
Case details for

State ex Rel. Tidline v. Hickerson

Case Details

Full title:STATE on the relation of SARAH TIDLINE v . WILLIS HICKERSON

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 1, 1875

Citations

72 N.C. 421 (N.C. 1875)

Citing Cases

State v. Liles

Accordingly, we find that in an unbroken line of decisions, down to and including S. v. Edwards, 110 N.C. 511…

State v. Edwards

S. v. Pate, supra. Depositions may be used because it is a civil proceeding. S. v. Hickerson, 72 N.C. 421;…