From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. Sun Pub. Co. v. Randolph Cir. Court

Supreme Court of Indiana
Jun 8, 1934
191 N.E. 136 (Ind. 1934)

Opinion

No. 26,440.

Filed June 8, 1934.

Original action by the State of Indiana on the relation of Sun Publishing Company and others against the Randolph Circuit Court and the judge thereof for a writ of prohibition. Temporary writ dissolved and permanent writ denied.

James R. Fleming, M.V. Skinner, Russell E. Wise, J.J. Moran, E.E. Chenowith and Byron Jenkins, for relators. William H. Eichhorn, Robert L. Smith, John W. Macy, Richard L. Ewbank, and George H. Koons, for respondents.


The relators assert that the respondents were threatening to appoint a receiver for them in an action in which they were not before the court. The special findings of the court are somewhat ambiguous, and, when taken together with the contentions and theories of counsel for plaintiffs below, would lead to the conclusion that the respondents contemplated such action.

A response has been filed denying any intention to appoint a receiver for relators or their property, and, in view of this response, we must conclude that there was and is no intention to appoint a receiver for relators, or any property in their possession claimed by them, notwithstanding the ambiguities referred to.

The temporary writ of prohibition heretofore granted is dissolved and a permanent writ denied.


Summaries of

State ex Rel. Sun Pub. Co. v. Randolph Cir. Court

Supreme Court of Indiana
Jun 8, 1934
191 N.E. 136 (Ind. 1934)
Case details for

State ex Rel. Sun Pub. Co. v. Randolph Cir. Court

Case Details

Full title:STATE EX REL. SUN PUBLISHING COMPANY v. RANDOLPH CIRCUIT COURT ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Indiana

Date published: Jun 8, 1934

Citations

191 N.E. 136 (Ind. 1934)
191 N.E. 136

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Perkins v. Franklin Cir. Ct.

Since no action whatever affecting the interest of the relator in any way is threatened, the temporary writ…

State ex rel. Cordes v. Fayette Circuit Court

It appearing to the satisfaction of this court that the relief sought by the relator has been extended, no…