From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State, ex Rel. Rhodes v. Bd. of Elections

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 4, 1967
230 N.E.2d 347 (Ohio 1967)

Opinion

No. 41240

Decided October 4, 1967.

Municipal corporations — Initiative and referendum — Powers reserved to people — Questions municipality authorized to control by legislative action.

IN MANDAMUS.

Messrs. Rudd, Ober Miller, for relators.

Mr. Fred V. Skok, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Paul H. Mitrovich, for respondents.


This is an action in mandamus originating in this court. By this action, relators seek to compel the respondent Board of Elections of Lake County to place the following resolution proposed by initiative petition on the ballot:

"Be it resolved by the people of the Village of Willoughby Hills, Ohio, that:

"The President of the United States should bring all American troops home from Vietnam now so that the Vietnamese people can settle their own affairs."

Section 1f, Article II, of the Ohio Constitution, provides for municipal initiative and reads as follows:

"The initiative and referendum powers are hereby reserved to the people of each municipality on all questions which such municipalities may now or hereafter be authorized by law to control by legislative action; such powers shall be exercised in the manner now or hereafter provided by law." (Emphasis added.)

The initiative petition in the instant case does not contain any question which a municipality is authorized by law to control by legislative action.

Writ denied.

TAFT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, MATTHIAS, O'NEILL, HERBERT, SCHNEIDER and BROWN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State, ex Rel. Rhodes v. Bd. of Elections

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 4, 1967
230 N.E.2d 347 (Ohio 1967)
Case details for

State, ex Rel. Rhodes v. Bd. of Elections

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE, EX REL. RHODES ET AL. v. BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF LAKE COUNTY ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Oct 4, 1967

Citations

230 N.E.2d 347 (Ohio 1967)
230 N.E.2d 347

Citing Cases

State ex rel. City of Brecksville v. Husted

The cases that the city cites are consequently inapposite. See State ex rel. Upper Arlington v. Franklin Cty.…

State ex Rel. v. Bd. of Elections

Mandamus will not lie to compel a board of elections to submit an ordinance proposed by initiative petition…