From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex rel. Palacios v. Rea

Oregon Court of Appeals
Feb 6, 2002
39 P.3d 289 (Or. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

00C-10960; A109434

Submitted on record and briefs January 4, 2002.

Filed: February 6, 2002

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County. Joseph V. Ochoa, Judge.

Antonio S. Palacios filed the brief pro se.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General, and Kaye E. McDonald, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and LINDER and WOLLHEIM, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Judgment for filing fees of $167 reversed; otherwise affirmed.


Plaintiff appeals from the trial court's dismissal of his petition for writ of mandamus. As part of its judgment, the court required plaintiff to pay filing fees of $167, which the trial court had initially deferred pursuant to ORS 21.605(1)(a). Plaintiff challenges both the dismissal and the imposition of filing fees. We reject without discussion plaintiff's arguments as to the merits of the dismissal. However, as defendant concedes, the judgment for filing fees was erroneous. See State ex rel Baker v. Cook, 171 Or. App. 719, 16 P.3d 1184 (2000).

Judgment for filing fees of $167 reversed; otherwise affirmed.


Summaries of

State ex rel. Palacios v. Rea

Oregon Court of Appeals
Feb 6, 2002
39 P.3d 289 (Or. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

State ex rel. Palacios v. Rea

Case Details

Full title:STATE ex rel ANTONIO SANCHEZ PALACIOS, Appellant, v. DIANE M. REA…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Feb 6, 2002

Citations

39 P.3d 289 (Or. Ct. App. 2002)
39 P.3d 289