Secondly, the Bar Association cites to this Court cases from the recent past in which discipline has been imposed for making material misrepresentations to a court for which a minimum of one year suspension was ordered. These cases are: State of Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Peveto, 620 P.2d 392 (Okla. 1980), State of Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma BarAssociation v. Hensley, 661 P.2d 527 (Okla. 1983), State of Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Zahorsky, 569 P.2d 437 (Okla. 1977), State of Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Scott William Katz, 733 P.2d 406 (Okla. 1987), and State of Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Ed Moore, 741 P.2d 445 (Okla. 1987). These cases are distinguishable from the matter before the Court on several points.
In another case concerning perjured testimony relating to repayment of a loan from a client this Court determined that disbarment was the appropriate discipline. State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Zahorsky, 569 P.2d 437 (Okla. 1977). The Complainant has requested this Court to impose a suspension of at least two years so that respondent would have to redemonstrate his fitness to practice law after the suspension has been served.
State ex rel. Okla. Bar Ass'n. v. Evans, 747 P.2d 277 (Okla. 1987); State ex rel. Okla. Bar Ass'n. v. Raskin, 642 P.2d 262 (Okla. 1982).State ex rel. Okla. Bar Ass'n. v. Moore, 741 P.2d 445, 446 (Okla. 1987); State ex rel. Okla. Bar Ass'n. v. Katz, 733 P.2d 406 (Okla. 1987); State ex rel. Okla. Bar Ass'n. v. Smalley, 55 O.B.J. 1 (Jan. 7, 1984); State ex rel. Okla. Bar Ass'n. v. Hensley, 661 P.2d 527 (Okla. 1983); State ex rel. Okla. Bar Ass'n. v. Peveto, 620 P.2d 392 (Okla. 1980); State ex rel. Okla. Bar Ass'n. v. Zahorsky, 569 P.2d 437 (Okla. 1977). However, the good character and reputation of Stubblefield attested to by attorneys and members of the judiciary are considered by this Court in mitigation of the penalty imposed.