From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. McChesney v. Henderson

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Mar 15, 1972
258 So. 2d 550 (La. 1972)

Opinion

No. 52142.

March 15, 1972.

In re: David C. McChesney applying for writ of habeas corpus, mandamus and certiorari.


Writ refused. The evidentiary hearing held on this application in the trial court supports the validity of this guilty plea.

BARHAM, Justice, does not concur. Neither the contemporaneous record nor the post plea evidentiary hearing show any explanation by the court of any constitutional rights to nor any waiver of the defendant of any of his constitutional rights before pleading. See my dissent in State ex rel. LeBlanc v. Henderson, 261 La. 315, 259 So.2d 557.

TATE, J., concurs in denial. See State ex rel. LeBlanc v. Henderson, 261 La. 315, 259 So.2d 557. (Rendered March 8, 1972).

DIXON, J., dissents from the refusal to grant the application.


Summaries of

State ex Rel. McChesney v. Henderson

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Mar 15, 1972
258 So. 2d 550 (La. 1972)
Case details for

State ex Rel. McChesney v. Henderson

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA EX REL. DAVID C. MCCHESNEY v. C. MURRAY HENDERSON…

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Mar 15, 1972

Citations

258 So. 2d 550 (La. 1972)
260 La. 1196

Citing Cases

State v. Jackson

Courts have held that failure to advise of collateral, but foreseeable, adverse consequences of a guilty plea…

State ex Rel. Fournette v. Henderson

BARHAM, J., does not concur. See State ex rel. McChesney v. Henderson dissent, 260 La. 1196, 258 So.2d 550,…