From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. Massie v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Ohio
Feb 19, 1997
77 Ohio St. 3d 449 (Ohio 1997)

Opinion

No. 96-2186

Submitted January 7, 1997 —

Decided February 19, 1997.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Union County, No. 14-96-25.

In 1993, the Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas convicted appellant, Barbara Lynn Massie, of sexual battery and sentenced her to an indeterminate term of three-to-ten years in prison. In 1996, Massie filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the Court of Appeals for Union County. Massie claimed that she was entitled to immediate release from prison because the trial court improperly sentenced her. The court of appeals granted the Civ.R. 12(B)(6) motion of appellee, Shirley Rogers, Warden of the Ohio Reformatory for Women, and dismissed Massie's petition.

The cause is now before this court upon an appeal as of right.

Barbara Lynn Massie, pro se. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Lillian B. Earl, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


Massie contends that the judgment of the court of appeals should be dismissed because the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter an indeterminate sentence on her conviction for sexual battery. But sentencing errors are not jurisdictional and are not cognizable in habeas corpus. Majoros v. Collins (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 442, 443, 596 N.E.2d 1038, 1039.

In addition, although habeas corpus relief may be granted for nonjurisdictional claims, the petitioner must have no adequate remedy at law. State ex rel. Pirman v. Money (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 591, 593, 635 N.E.2d 26, 29. Appeal or postconviction relief are remedies at law to review claimed sentencing errors. Blackburn v. Jago (1988), 39 Ohio St.3d 139, 139-140, 529 N.E.2d 929, 930. Since Massie possessed adequate legal remedies by an appeal or postconviction relief to raise the alleged sentencing error, the court of appeals properly dismissed the petition. Thomas v. Collins (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 413, 413-414, 659 N.E.2d 790, 790-791.

Based on the foregoing, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State ex Rel. Massie v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Ohio
Feb 19, 1997
77 Ohio St. 3d 449 (Ohio 1997)
Case details for

State ex Rel. Massie v. Rogers

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE EX REL. MASSIE, APPELLANT, v. ROGERS, WARDEN, APPELLEE

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Feb 19, 1997

Citations

77 Ohio St. 3d 449 (Ohio 1997)
674 N.E.2d 1383

Citing Cases

State v. Newell

Any claimed errors must be addressed through an appeal or postconviction relief. Thomas v. Huffman, 84 Ohio…

State ex rel. Ogletree v. Bradshaw

{¶15} At the outset, we note Ogletree has or had adequate remedies at law by appeal or post conviction relief…