From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. Kansas City v. Trimble

Supreme Court of Missouri, Court en Banc
Mar 27, 1929
20 S.W.2d 20 (Mo. 1929)

Opinion

No. 29017.

March 27, 1929.

PROHIBITION: Certiorari. For the reasons given in the certiorari case of State ex rel. Kansas City v. Trimble, ante page 360, the provisional rule in this prohibition case is discharged and the proceeding dismissed.

And for like reasons four other prohibition cases entitled State ex rel. Kansas City v. Trimble, Nos. 29018, 29019, 29020 and 29021, are dismissed.

Prohibition.

DISMISSED.


This case differs from State ex rel. Kansas City v. Trimble et al., No. 29012, ante page 360, in that the latter case is a certiorari proceeding and this case is a prohibition proceeding. This case (No. 29017) was argued and briefed with the certiorari case (No. 29012) decided at the present term of this court. While the proceedings are different, the facts and questions in this case were submitted for determination in the certiorari case, and for reasons given in that case our provisional rule herein is discharged and the proceeding dismissed. All concur, except Walker, J., who concurs in the result.


Summaries of

State ex Rel. Kansas City v. Trimble

Supreme Court of Missouri, Court en Banc
Mar 27, 1929
20 S.W.2d 20 (Mo. 1929)
Case details for

State ex Rel. Kansas City v. Trimble

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE EX REL. KANSAS CITY v. FRANCIS H. TRIMBLE ET AL., Judges of…

Court:Supreme Court of Missouri, Court en Banc

Date published: Mar 27, 1929

Citations

20 S.W.2d 20 (Mo. 1929)
20 S.W.2d 20

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Brenner v. Trimble

(1) Questions here for determination: (a) Should the court, contrary to our belief and insistence, hold that…

City of St. Louis v. Smith

ex rel. Barnett v. McDonnell, 280 S.W. 66; Luth v. Kansas City, 203 Mo. App. 110, 218 S.W. 901; State ex…