From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Cornett

Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 27, 1994
865 P.2d 1295 (Or. 1994)

Summary

rejecting argument that "OEC 803 does not apply, because the person hearing the statements did not have a medical degree": "[T]he issue is not whether the treating therapist who heard [the child's] statements possesses certain credentials. The issue is whether the statements meet the three requirements described in Moen * * *."

Summary of this case from State ex Rel. Juv. Dept. v. Pfaff

Opinion

CC 86110; CA A70521 (Control); SC S40547, D8308-66069; CA A70580; SC S40548

Argued January 7, 1993 Submitted January 7, 1994,

review dismissed as improvidently allowed January 27, 1994

In Banc

On review from the Court of Appeals.

Appeal from Multnomah County Circuit Court, Michael H. Marcus, District Judge, Circuit Judge pro tempore. 121 Or. App. 264, 855 P.2d 171 (1993).

Argued and submitted January 7, 1994.

Michael A. Greenlick, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner on review James Cornett.

Peter Miller, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner on review Shannon Huskey.

Janie M. Burcart, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review State ex rel Juvenile Department of Multnomah County. With her on the response to the petitions were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Michael C. Livingston, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.

No appearance contra for respondent on review Karin Cornett, fka Karin Huskey.

No appearance contra for the children.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Review dismissed as improvidently allowed.


Summaries of

State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Cornett

Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 27, 1994
865 P.2d 1295 (Or. 1994)

rejecting argument that "OEC 803 does not apply, because the person hearing the statements did not have a medical degree": "[T]he issue is not whether the treating therapist who heard [the child's] statements possesses certain credentials. The issue is whether the statements meet the three requirements described in Moen * * *."

Summary of this case from State ex Rel. Juv. Dept. v. Pfaff
Case details for

State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Cornett

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of C. and K., Children. STATE ex rel JUVENILE DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Jan 27, 1994

Citations

865 P.2d 1295 (Or. 1994)
865 P.2d 1295

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Juv. Dept. v. Pfaff

Rather, "[s]tatements to hospital attendants, ambulance drivers or even members of the family or friends may…

State v. Gonzales

The issue is whether the statements meet the three requirements." State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Cornett , 121…