From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. Goldstine v. Noble Circuit Court

Supreme Court of Indiana
Oct 15, 1959
240 Ind. 693 (Ind. 1959)

Opinion

No. 0-572.

Filed October 15, 1959.

Sam Goldstine, petitioner, has filed what purports to be a petition for a writ of mandamus.

Petition denied.

Sam Goldstine, pro se.


The petitioner herein has filed what purports to be a petition for a writ of mandamus. He is attempting to mandate the Noble Circuit Court to hear a "Verified Petition To Set Aside and Hold for Naught Void Judgment."

Supreme Court Rule 2-35, in relation to writs of mandate provides, in part: "If the relief sought relates to a proceeding in an inferior court certified copies of all pleadings, orders and entries pertaining to the subject matter should be set out in the petition or made exhibits thereto."

Petitioner has not complied with Rule 2-35, as above quoted, nor has he made a good faith effort to comply therewith as provided in State ex rel. Fritz et al. v. Del. C.C., etc. (1957), 236 Ind. 229, 139 N.E.2d 442; Teeple v. State, ex rel. (1908), 171 Ind. 268, 271, 86 N.E. 49.

Petition denied.

NOTE. — Reported in 161 N.E.2d 621.


Summaries of

State ex Rel. Goldstine v. Noble Circuit Court

Supreme Court of Indiana
Oct 15, 1959
240 Ind. 693 (Ind. 1959)
Case details for

State ex Rel. Goldstine v. Noble Circuit Court

Case Details

Full title:STATE EX REL. GOLDSTINE v. NOBLE CIRCUIT COURT

Court:Supreme Court of Indiana

Date published: Oct 15, 1959

Citations

240 Ind. 693 (Ind. 1959)
161 N.E.2d 621