Opinion
No. 28,813.
Filed June 18, 1951.
MANDAMUS — Jurisdiction, Proceedings and Relief — Petition — Form, Requisites and Sufficiency — Failure To Set Forth Pleadings, Orders and Entries — Petition Insufficient. — In an original mandamus action seeking relief relative to a proceeding in an inferior court, a petition failing to set forth, or have attached thereto as exhibits, all pleadings, orders and entries pertaining to the subject matter in the inferior court is insufficient and would be denied. Rules of the Supreme Court, 2-35.
Original action by the State of Indiana on the relation of Ivan Garlin against the Honorable Robert S. Baker, as Judge of the LaPorte Superior Court, for an alternative writ of mandamus.
Petition denied.
Ivan Garlin, pro se.
The relator, appearing pro se, files what he designates as a verified petition for an alternative writ of mandate to compel certain action by the respondent judge.
The relief sought relates to a proceeding in an inferior court, but wholly fails to comply with the requirements of Rule 2-35.
The issuance of the writ is denied.
NOTE. — Reported in 99 N.E.2d 257.