From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex rel. Feltner v. Cuyahoga Cnty. Bd. of Revision

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Mar 20, 2019
2019 Ohio 943 (Ohio 2019)

Opinion

2018-1307

03-20-2019

STATE EX REL. FELTNER v. CUYAHOGA CTY. BD. OF REVISION


MERIT DECISION WITHOUT OPINION

Sua sponte, alternative writ granted as to counts I and III against respondents Cuyahoga County Board of Revision, Armond Budish, Dennis G. Kennedy, and Michael Gallagher. The motion to dismiss of the Cuyahoga County respondents is granted as to all remaining counts in the complaint. The following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs as to counts I and III pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.05: The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days, relator shall file a brief within 10 days after the filing of the evidence, respondents shall file briefs within 20 days after the filing of relator's brief, and relator may file a reply brief within 7 days after the filing of respondents' briefs. Motions to dismiss of respondents Cuyahoga County Land Reutilization Corporation and Ohio Attorney General and motion to dismiss of Cuyahoga County respondents as to W. Christopher Murray II, and Cuyahoga County are granted, and these respondents are dismissed as parties from the case. Sua sponte, case to be scheduled for oral argument before the full court.

O'CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FRENCH, and DONNELLY, JJ., concur.

FISCHER, J., would also grant an alternative writ as to counts V and VI.

DEWINE, J., dissents and would grant respondents' motions to dismiss in full.

STEWART, J., not participating.


Summaries of

State ex rel. Feltner v. Cuyahoga Cnty. Bd. of Revision

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Mar 20, 2019
2019 Ohio 943 (Ohio 2019)
Case details for

State ex rel. Feltner v. Cuyahoga Cnty. Bd. of Revision

Case Details

Full title:STATE EX REL. FELTNER v. CUYAHOGA CTY. BD. OF REVISION

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio.

Date published: Mar 20, 2019

Citations

2019 Ohio 943 (Ohio 2019)
155 Ohio St. 3d 1403
119 N.E.3d 431

Citing Cases

State ex rel. U.S. Bank Tr. v. Cuyahoga Cnty.

{¶ 26} Respondent argues that the Supreme Court of Ohio rejected an argument similar to the one U.S. Bank…