From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. Cotton v. Russo

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County
Sep 13, 2010
2010 Ohio 4365 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010)

Opinion

No. 95163.

RELEASE DATE: September 13, 2010.

Writ of Mandamus/Procedendo Motion No. 434841, Order No. 436996.

WRIT DENIED.

Milton Cotton, pro se, for Relator.

William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecutor, By: James E. Moss, Assistant County Prosecutor, Attorneys for Respondent.


JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION


{¶ 1} On May 26, 2010, the relator, Milton Cotton, commenced this mandamus or procedendo action against the respondent, Judge John Russo, to compel the judge to decide and issue findings of fact and conclusions of law for a "Motion to vacate void ab initio order" which Cotton filed on August 11, 2009, in the underlying case, State of Ohio v. Milton Cotton, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CR-281730. On June 15, 2010, the respondent judge, through the Cuyahoga County Prosecutor, filed a motion for summary judgment on the grounds of mootness. Attached to this dispositive motion was a certified copy of a June 11, 2010 journal entry which states as follows: "Defendant's motion to vacate the void ab initio judgment entry of 8/14/1992, filed August 11, 2009, is denied. The Supreme Court of Ohio has determined that the sentencing journal entry in this case complies with Crim. R. 32(C). State ex rel. Cotton v. Russo (2010), ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2010 WL 2011466. Defendant's motion for findings and conclusions filed October 7, 2009, is denied." Cotton never filed a response to the judge's dispositive motion.

{¶ 2} This journal entry establishes that the respondent judge has fulfilled his duty to rule on the outstanding motions, and that Cotton has received his requested relief, a ruling with findings and conclusions. State ex rel. Carrion v. Harris (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 19, 530 N.E.2d 1330.

{¶ 3} Accordingly, this court grants the respondent judge's motion for summary judgment and denies Cotton's application for writs of mandamus or procedendo. Each side to bear its own costs. This court directs the Clerk of the Eighth District Court of Appeals to serve upon the parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. Civ. R. 58(B).

SEAN C. GALLAGHER, A.J., and MARY EILEEN KILBANE, J., CONCUR


Summaries of

State ex Rel. Cotton v. Russo

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County
Sep 13, 2010
2010 Ohio 4365 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010)
Case details for

State ex Rel. Cotton v. Russo

Case Details

Full title:State of Ohio, Ex Rel. Milton Cotton, Relator, v. Judge John Russo…

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County

Date published: Sep 13, 2010

Citations

2010 Ohio 4365 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010)