From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. Chrysler Motors Corp. v. Mayfield

Supreme Court of Ohio
Sep 2, 1992
64 Ohio St. 3d 505 (Ohio 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-766

Submitted May 12, 1992 —

Decided September 2, 1992.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 89AP-1203.

Decedent, John A. Mazzola, was killed in the course of and arising from his employment with appellant, Chrysler Motors Corporation. Decedent's widow filed an action against appellant and other corporate defendants, claiming, inter alia, that decedent died as a result of the "reckless, willful or intentional actions of Chrysler." The suit was later settled and dismissed. The settlement agreement required appellant to pay the widow $690,000. During the course of the proceedings leading up to the settlement, appellant incurred substantial legal fees. Shortly after settlement, appellant contacted appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio for reimbursement of settlement money and attorney fees from the Intentional Tort Fund, citing R.C. 4121.80(D). The commission refused reimbursement.

Appellant commenced an action in mandamus in the Court of Appeals for Franklin County to compel reimbursement of the aforestated monies. The court of appeals denied the writ, finding that appellant had not complied with R.C. 4121.80(D).

This cause is now before this court upon an appeal as of right.

Mansour, Gavin, Gerlack Manos Co., L.P.A., Jeffrey M. Embleton and Robert E. Blackham, for appellant.

Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, and Jeffery W. Clark, for appellees.


Subsequent to the decision below and the filing of briefs before this court, Brady v. Safety-Kleen Corp. (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 624, 576 N.E.2d 722, was decided. That decision invalidated R.C. 4121.80 in its entirety, negating any right to reimbursement of settlement money and attorney fees in this case.

For this reason, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., SWEENEY, HOLMES, DOUGLAS and RESNICK, JJ., concur.

WRIGHT, J., concurs in judgment only.

H. BROWN, J., not participating.


Summaries of

State ex Rel. Chrysler Motors Corp. v. Mayfield

Supreme Court of Ohio
Sep 2, 1992
64 Ohio St. 3d 505 (Ohio 1992)
Case details for

State ex Rel. Chrysler Motors Corp. v. Mayfield

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE EX REL. CHRYSLER MOTORS CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. MAYFIELD…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Sep 2, 1992

Citations

64 Ohio St. 3d 505 (Ohio 1992)
597 N.E.2d 118

Citing Cases

Rossborough Mfg. Co. v. Trimble

The Brady decision and the enactment of S.B. 192 were followed by an Ohio Supreme Court per curiam decision…

Roberts v. Treasurer

eith, supra; Welton v. Lincoln Elec. Co. (Sept. 19, 1997), Lawrence App. No. 97CA5, unreported, citing Keith,…