From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. Campbell v. Corrigan

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County
Sep 20, 2001
No. 79525 (Ohio Ct. App. Sep. 20, 2001)

Opinion

No. 79525.

Decided September 20, 2001.

WRIT OF MANDAMUS Judgment, Motion No. 31409.

For Relator: WALTER L. CAMPBELL, pro se Inmate No. 377-419 Richland Correctional Inst. P.O. Box 8107 Mansfield, Ohio 44901.

For Respondent: WILLIAM D. MASON, ESQ. Cuyahoga County Prosecutor BY: DIANE SMILANICK, ESQ. Assistant County Prosecutor Justice Center — 9th Floor 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44115.


ORIGINAL ACTION JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION


Relator requests that this court compel respondent judge to increase the number of days of jail time credit from 342 to 424 in State v. Campbell, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CR-366486.

Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss and argues that he discharged his duty when he granted relator 342 days jail time credit. Relator has not opposed the motion.

Respondent argues that relief in mandamus is not appropriate. We agree.

The relator, through his petition for a writ of mandamus, seeks to challenge the calculation of jail time credit as made by the respondent. Mandamus, however, may not be employed to correct errors associated with the calculation of jail time credit. State ex rel. Corder v. Wilson (1991), 68 Ohio App.3d 567, 589 N.E.2d 113; State ex rel. Johnson v. O'Donnell (Oct. 4, 1994), Cuyahoga App. No. 67783, unreported. The relator may challenge any error associated with the calculation of jail time credit through a direct appeal.

State ex rel. Johnson v. O'Donnell, supra. State ex rel. Hill v. Green (Dec. 10, 1998), Cuyahoga App. No. 75433, unreported, at 1-2.

A review of the docket in Case No. CR-366486 reflects that respondent has issued a journal entry, which was received for filing on October 16, 2000, awarding applicant 345 days jail time credit. Respondent has, therefore, discharged his duty to specify the number of days of jail time credit. Relief does not lie in mandamus to compel respondent to issue an order increasing the number of days of jail time credit.

Accordingly, respondent's motion to dismiss is granted. Relator to pay costs.

ANN DYKE, P.J., AND JAMES J. SWEENEY, J., CONCUR.


Summaries of

State ex Rel. Campbell v. Corrigan

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County
Sep 20, 2001
No. 79525 (Ohio Ct. App. Sep. 20, 2001)
Case details for

State ex Rel. Campbell v. Corrigan

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OHIO ex rel. WALTER L. CAMPBELL Relator v. HON. DANIEL O…

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County

Date published: Sep 20, 2001

Citations

No. 79525 (Ohio Ct. App. Sep. 20, 2001)

Citing Cases

Pursley v. State

State ex rel. Corder v. Wilson (1991), 68 Ohio App.3d 567, 589 N.E.2d 113. See also State ex rel. Campbell v.…