From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex rel. Bryson v. GAC Merchandising, Inc.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jul 27, 2005
830 N.E.2d 1160 (Ohio 2005)

Opinion

No. 2004-1435.

Submitted May 10, 2005.

Decided July 27, 2005.

Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 03AP-650, 2004-Ohio-3723.

Mark R. Naegel, Cincinnati, for appellant.

Jim Petro, Attorney General, and William J. McDonald, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio.


{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'CONNOR and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.

RESNICK and O'DONNELL, JJ., dissent and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.


Summaries of

State ex rel. Bryson v. GAC Merchandising, Inc.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jul 27, 2005
830 N.E.2d 1160 (Ohio 2005)
Case details for

State ex rel. Bryson v. GAC Merchandising, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:The STATE ex rel. BRYSON, APPELLANT, v. GAC MERCHANDISING, INC. ET AL.…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jul 27, 2005

Citations

830 N.E.2d 1160 (Ohio 2005)
830 N.E.2d 1160
2005 Ohio 3556

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Lancaster v. Indus. Comm.

{¶ 7} This court has recognized that the commission's guidelines for assessing disability are different from…

Lawson v. Industrial Comm. of Ohio

As noted in the findings of fact, relator applied for and began receiving Social Security disability benefits…