From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex rel. Brock v. McCafferty

Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
Dec 13, 2011
2011 Ohio 6484 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011)

Opinion

No. 97316

12-13-2011

STATE OF OHIO, EX REL., CLAUDE BROCK RELATOR v. JUDGE BRIDGET MCCAFFERTY RESPONDENT

FOR RELATOR Claude Brock, pr se Inmate #A-560-610 North Coast Correctional Treatment Facility ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT William D. Mason Cuyahoga County Prosecutor By: James E. Moss Assistant County Prosecutor Justice Center, 9th Fl.


JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION


JUDGMENT:

WRIT DENIED


Writ of Prohibition

Motion Nos. 448286

Order No. 450135

FOR RELATOR

Claude Brock, pr se

Inmate #A-560-610

North Coast Correctional

Treatment Facility

ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT

William D. Mason

Cuyahoga County Prosecutor

By: James E. Moss

Assistant County Prosecutor

Justice Center, 9th Fl.
MELODY J. STEWART, P.J.:

{¶ 1} On September 15, 2011, the relator, Claude Brock, commenced this mandamus action against the respondent, Judge Bridget McCafferty, to compel her to rule on his motions for jail time credit, filed on December 7, 2010, and June 8, 2011, in the underlying case, State v. Brock, Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Case No. CR-513753. Brock sought seven days of credit according to his complaint. On October 5, 2011, the respondent's successor judge, moved for summary judgment on the grounds of mootness. Attached to the dispositive motion was a certified copy of a September 14, 2011 journal entry granting 14 days of jail time credit in the underlying case. Brock never opposed the respondent's motion. This establishes that the relator has received his requested relief, a resolution of his subject motions, and that the action is, therefore, moot. State ex rel. Corder v. Wilson (1991), 68 Ohio App.3d 567, 589 N.E.2d 113.

The motion for summary judgment recognized that Judge Michael Astrab is the successor to Judge McCafferty.

{¶ 2} Accordingly, the court grants the respondent's motion for summary judgment and denies the application for a writ of mandamus. Respondent to pay

{¶ 3} costs. The clerk is directed to serve upon the parties notice of this judgment and

{¶ 4} its date of entry upon the journal. Civ. R.58(B).

Writ denied. MELODY J. STEWART, PRESIDING JUDGE JAMES J. SWEENEY, J., and
COLLEEN CONWAY COONEY, J., CONCUR.


Summaries of

State ex rel. Brock v. McCafferty

Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
Dec 13, 2011
2011 Ohio 6484 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011)
Case details for

State ex rel. Brock v. McCafferty

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OHIO, EX REL., CLAUDE BROCK RELATOR v. JUDGE BRIDGET MCCAFFERTY…

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

Date published: Dec 13, 2011

Citations

2011 Ohio 6484 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011)