From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State Div. of Human Rights v. Wayne Drug Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 20, 1978
60 A.D.2d 990 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Opinion

January 20, 1978

Present — Marsh, P.J., Cardamone, Simons, Hancock, Jr., and Denman, JJ.


Petition unanimously granted, without costs, determination and order of Human Rights Appeal Board annulled and determination of the State Division of Human Rights reinstated. Memorandum: Complainant alleged that he was discriminated against in his employment because of his sex, his ancestry, and because of his disability resulting from a heart attack. The State Division of Human Rights found no probable cause and dismissed the complaint. The appeals board, relying upon our decision in Matter of Mayo v Hopeman Lbr. Mfg. Co. ( 33 A.D.2d 310, mot for lv to app den 26 N.Y.2d 962), found questions of fact which required a hearing. In State Div. of Human Rights v New York State Drug Abuse Control Comm. ( 59 A.D.2d 332), we distinguished Mayo (supra) and held that the appeals board may not reverse a finding of no probable cause of the division unless the division's decision is arbitrary and not supported by the record. If the division acts reasonably and arrives at its decision after a full investigation and full opportunity to the complainant to be heard, then it should stand. Since the investigation and findings of no probable cause in this case satisfies the requirements stated in Speller, we annul the determination of the Human Rights Appeal Board and reinstate the decision of the State Division of Human Rights.


Summaries of

State Div. of Human Rights v. Wayne Drug Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 20, 1978
60 A.D.2d 990 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)
Case details for

State Div. of Human Rights v. Wayne Drug Co.

Case Details

Full title:STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS, Respondent, v. WAYNE DRUG COMPANY et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 20, 1978

Citations

60 A.D.2d 990 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Citing Cases

State Div. of Human Rights v. Riverside Serv

At that hearing the exhibits demonstrated that the male co-worker whom complainant alleged had been preferred…

Cornwell v. IBM Corp.

The allegations in petitioner's complaint were reviewed and an investigative inquiry form containing detailed…