From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State Div. of Human Rights v. Ingersoll-Rand

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 14, 1984
106 A.D.2d 917 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

December 14, 1984

Present — Hancock, Jr., J.P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and O'Donnell, JJ.


Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: Complainant seeks review pursuant to section 298 Exec. of the Executive Law (L 1984, ch 83) of the determination of the State Division of Human Rights dismissing his complaint which alleged that respondent employer discriminated against him in a matter of employment because of his disability. The Division representatives conducted an adequate investigation of the complaint and there is a rational basis in the record for the determination of no probable cause ( State Div. of Human Rights v. New York State Drug Abuse Control Comm., 59 A.D.2d 332; see, also, State Div. of Human Rights v Oswald Hof Brau Haus, 91 A.D.2d 865; Meachem v. New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 87 A.D.2d 813).


Summaries of

State Div. of Human Rights v. Ingersoll-Rand

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 14, 1984
106 A.D.2d 917 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

State Div. of Human Rights v. Ingersoll-Rand

Case Details

Full title:STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS, on Complaint of FREDERICK WIDGER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 14, 1984

Citations

106 A.D.2d 917 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

State Division v. Trico Products

Present — Hancock, Jr., J.P., Doerr, Denman, Green and O'Donnell, JJ. Determination unanimously confirmed and…

State Division v. St. Joseph's Hosp

Present — Dillon, P.J., Doerr, Denman, Boomer and Schnepp, JJ. Determination unanimously confirmed and…