From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State Board of Ins v. Todd Shipyards

Supreme Court of Texas
Mar 15, 1961
162 Tex. 8 (Tex. 1961)

Opinion

No. A-8150.

February 8, 1961. Rehearing Denied March 15, 1961.

Will Wilson, Atty. Gen., Fred B. Werkenthin and Bob E. Shannon, Assts. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.

Liddell, Austin, Dawson Huggins, Houston, Charles R. Vickery, Jr., and Willis

Witt, Houston, with above firm, for respondent.


We are of the opinion that the decision in this case is controlled by Allgeyer v. State of Louisiana, 165 U.S. 578, 17 S.Ct. 427, 41 L.Ed. 832 and St. Louis Cotton Compress Company v. State of Arkansas, 260 U.S. 346, 43 S.Ct. 125, 67 L.Ed. 297. We are unwilling to take the position that in view of Osborn v. Ozlin, 310 U.S. 53, 60 S.Ct. 758, 84 L.Ed. 1074 and Hoopeston Canning Co. v. Cullen, 318 U.S. 313, 63 S.Ct. 602, 87 L.Ed. 777, the Supreme Court of the United States will probably overrule the Allgeyer and Cotton Compress cases. We abide by what the Supreme Court has held and refuse to speculate upon what said Court may hold.

The application for writ of error to the Court of Civil Appeals (opinion reported in 340 S.W.2d 339) is refused, no reversible error.


Summaries of

State Board of Ins v. Todd Shipyards

Supreme Court of Texas
Mar 15, 1961
162 Tex. 8 (Tex. 1961)
Case details for

State Board of Ins v. Todd Shipyards

Case Details

Full title:STATE BOARD OF INSURANCE et al., Petitioner, v. TODD SHIPYARDS…

Court:Supreme Court of Texas

Date published: Mar 15, 1961

Citations

162 Tex. 8 (Tex. 1961)
162 Tex. 8

Citing Cases

State v. State Mut. Life Assur. Co. of America

o have assented thereto as a condition precedent to its right to engage in such business within this State".…

State Bd. of Ins. v. Todd Shipyards

" 303 U.S., at 82. The Texas Court of Civil Appeals, 340 S.W.2d 339, and the Texas Supreme Court, feeling…