State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frameworkers.com, Inc.

1 Citing case

  1. Ironshore Specialty Ins. Co. v. Haines & Kibblehouse, Inc.

    3 F. Supp. 3d 303 (E.D. Pa. 2014)   Cited 6 times
    Rejecting the plaintiff's argument that the order of filing of the declaratory judgment actions—with the federal action being first and the state court action being filed second—weighed in favor of the federal court retaining jurisdiction

    See, e.g., ITT Industries, Inc. v. Pacific Employers Ins. Co., 427 F.Supp.2d 552, 563 (E.D.Pa.2006); Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. Broaddus, No. 08–3241, 2009 WL 349697, at *9 (E.D.Pa. Feb. 11, 2009) (declining jurisdiction over federal declaratory judgment under Summy); General Cas. Co. of Wisconsin v. Guzikowski, No. 11–5154, 2011 WL 10654018, at *4 (E.D.Pa. Dec. 9, 2011); First Mercury Ins. Co. v. Legends, Inc., 914 F.Supp.2d 644 (E.D.Pa.2012); Allstate Ins. Co. v. Manilla, No. 11–5102, 2012 WL 1392559, at *2 (E.D.Pa. Apr. 20, 2012); State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frameworkers.com, Inc., No. 11–3271, 2012 WL 3627427 (E.D.Pa. Aug. 23, 2012). The second factor also weighs in favor of abstention.