From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Horton

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1925
129 S.E. 925 (N.C. 1925)

Opinion

(Filed 16 September, 1925.)

APPEAL by defendants from Cranmer, J., at March Term, 1925, of GATES.

Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.

Bridger Eley for defendants.


Criminal prosecution, tried upon an indictment, charging the defendants with violations of the prohibition law.

From an adverse verdict and judgment pronounced thereon, the defendants appeal, assigning errors.


The evidence is plenary and conflicting on the issues of defendants' guilt; it is purely a question of fact; the jury has resolved the matter against the defendants; there is no reversible error appearing on the record; the verdict and judgments will be upheld.

No error.


Summaries of

State v. Horton

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1925
129 S.E. 925 (N.C. 1925)
Case details for

State v. Horton

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. WILLIAM HORTON AND OSCAR HORTON

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 1, 1925

Citations

129 S.E. 925 (N.C. 1925)
129 S.E. 925