From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Staruh v. Winstead

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 5, 2012
Civil Action No. 3:11-cv-1604 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 5, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:11-cv-1604

04-05-2012

CANDICE STARUH Petitioner, v. RHODA WINSTEAD, Respondents.


(JUDGE CAPUTO)


(MAGISTRATE JUDGE SMYSER)


ORDER

NOW this 5thday of April, 2012, upon review of the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge J. Andrew Smyser (Doc. 11) for plain error or manifest injustice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 11) is ADOPTED.
(2) The petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED.
(3) A Certificate of Appealability SHALL NOT ISSUE.
(4) The Clerk of Court is directed to mark the case as CLOSED.

___________________________

A. Richard Caputo

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Staruh v. Winstead

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 5, 2012
Civil Action No. 3:11-cv-1604 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 5, 2012)
Case details for

Staruh v. Winstead

Case Details

Full title:CANDICE STARUH Petitioner, v. RHODA WINSTEAD, Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Apr 5, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:11-cv-1604 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 5, 2012)