From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Start v. Sugarcreek Stores, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 1996
234 A.D.2d 933 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

December 30, 1996.

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed.

Present — Denman, P.J., Green, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.


Supreme Court erred in denying defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff" Kathleen Start was injured in an unprovoked attack by defendant's employee. Although an employer may be liable when it hires or retains an employee with knowledge of his propensity for the type of behavior that caused plaintiff's injuries, defendant submitted proof in admissible form establishing that it had no such knowledge, and the evidence submitted by plaintiff" is insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact ( see, Farrell v McIntosh, 221 AD2d 312, 313-314, lv denied 87 NY2d 809; Curtis v City of Utica, 209 AD2d 1024, 1025; Kirkman v Astoria Gen. Hosp., 204 AD2d 401, 403, lv denied 84 NY2d 811, rearg denied 85 NY2d 858). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J."Summary Judgment.)


Summaries of

Start v. Sugarcreek Stores, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 1996
234 A.D.2d 933 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Start v. Sugarcreek Stores, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KATHLEEN START, Respondent, et al., Plaintiff, v. SUGARCREEK STORES, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 30, 1996

Citations

234 A.D.2d 933 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
652 N.Y.S.2d 193

Citing Cases

Zanghi v. Laborers' Intl. Un. N. Am., Afl-Cio

Those defendants may be held liable for the conduct of Piniewski only if they knew or should have known of…

Piniewski v. Panepinto

smissing the second amended complaint and cross claim against it. The cause of action for assault cannot be…