From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Starry v. Peterson

Court of Appeal of California, Third District
Dec 9, 1933
135 Cal.App. 790 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)

Opinion

Docket No. 4930.

December 9, 1933.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Del Norte County. Harry W. Falk, Judge Presiding. Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Fred W. Carroll and Geo. H. Howe, City Attorneys, for Appellant.

Puter Quinn for Respondent.


THE COURT.

This is a companion case to that of Starry v. Lake, Civil No. 4931 ( ante, p. 677 [28 P. 80]), in which an opinion of this court has this day been filed.

Both cases were submitted upon the same briefs and the question in each is identical.

[1] Upon the authority of the case of Starry v. Lake, ante, p. 677, the judgment in the instant case is affirmed.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on January 8, 1934.


Summaries of

Starry v. Peterson

Court of Appeal of California, Third District
Dec 9, 1933
135 Cal.App. 790 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)
Case details for

Starry v. Peterson

Case Details

Full title:FRANK W. STARRY, Respondent, v. ARTHUR PETERSON, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Third District

Date published: Dec 9, 1933

Citations

135 Cal.App. 790 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)
28 P.2d 83