From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Starr v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 23, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-0083 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-0083 KJN P

01-23-2012

ROBIN GILLEN STARR, Petitioner, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

On January 11, 2012, petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Therefore, petitioner will be provided the opportunity to either submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or submit the appropriate filing fee.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.

_________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
star0083.101a


Summaries of

Starr v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 23, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-0083 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Starr v. California

Case Details

Full title:ROBIN GILLEN STARR, Petitioner, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 23, 2012

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-0083 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2012)