Opinion
21-2031-EFM-GEB
12-10-2021
REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER
Gwynne E. Birzer U.S. Magistrate Judge.
Having considered Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order (ECF No. 71), the Court finds that good cause has been shown to modify the schedule and the motion should be granted.
As used in this scheduling order, the term "plaintiff" includes plaintiffs as well as counterclaimants, cross-claimants, third-party plaintiffs, intervenors, and any other parties who assert affirmative claims for relief. The term "defendant" includes defendants as well as counterclaim defendants, cross-claim defendants, third-party defendants, and any other parties who are defending against affirmative claims for relief.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order (ECF No. 71) is hereby GRANTED, and the scheduling order shall be revised as noted in the table that follows. Note the Court has adjusted the parties' proposals to align with the Court's practices regarding the timing of discovery and pretrial conferences. Additionally, all other information and instructions included in the Scheduling Order (ECF No. 40) shall continue to govern this case. 1
IT IS SO ORDERED. 2