From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Starlite Acupuncture, P.C. v. MVAIC

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Aug 2, 2019
64 Misc. 3d 140 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)

Opinion

2016-3029 K C

08-02-2019

STARLITE ACUPUNCTURE, P.C., as Assignee of Pressley, Kevin, Respondent, v. MVAIC, Appellant.

Marshall & Marshall, PLLC (Barbara Carabell, New York, of counsel), for appellant. The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for respondent.


Marshall & Marshall, PLLC (Barbara Carabell, New York, of counsel), for appellant.

The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for respondent.

PRESENT: : MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., MICHELLE WESTON, THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, JJ

ORDERED that the order is reversed, with $30 costs, and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (sued herein as MVAIC) appeals from an order of the Civil Court which denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

For the reasons stated in Starlite Acupuncture, P.C., as Assignee of Torres, Yamil v. MVAIC (––– Misc 3d ––––, 2019 NY Slip Op –––– [appeal No. 2016-3006 K C], decided herewith), the order is reversed and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

PESCE, P.J., WESTON and ALIOTTA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Starlite Acupuncture, P.C. v. MVAIC

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Aug 2, 2019
64 Misc. 3d 140 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
Case details for

Starlite Acupuncture, P.C. v. MVAIC

Case Details

Full title:Starlite Acupuncture, P.C., as Assignee of Pressley, Kevin, Respondent, v…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

Date published: Aug 2, 2019

Citations

64 Misc. 3d 140 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 51244
117 N.Y.S.3d 421