From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Starks v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Mar 17, 2000
759 So. 2d 759 (La. 2000)

Opinion

No. 1999-C-3570.

March 17, 2000

IN RE: Transportation Development Department of; — Defendant; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Iberville, 18th Judicial District Court Div. B, Nos. 39018; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 98 CA 1670.


Granted. See per curiam.

CDT

PFC

WFM

HTL

BJJ

JPV

JTK

KIMBALL, J., not on panel.


This application is granted.

The trial judge abused his discretion in granting a new trial because he wanted to judge the character and demeanor of live witnesses, rather than to decide the case on the record of the trial before his predecessor judge. The judgment of the trial court granting a new trial is reversed, and the motion for new trial is denied. The case is remanded to the court of appeal to review, on the record, the judgment of the trial court on original hearing.

The predecessor judge retired after rendering judgment. The present judge, after taking office, was called upon to rule on the timely motion for new trial.


Summaries of

Starks v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Mar 17, 2000
759 So. 2d 759 (La. 2000)
Case details for

Starks v. State

Case Details

Full title:GAIL STARKS v. STATE OF LOUISIANA, DOTD. ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Mar 17, 2000

Citations

759 So. 2d 759 (La. 2000)

Citing Cases

Schulingkamp v. Ochsner Clinic

That issue was whether a medical malpractice plaintiff may file a request for a medical review panel at any…

Rodriguez v. State

"[A] trial judge's ruling on the `genuineness' of a peremptory challenge `will be affirmed on appeal unless…