Starks v. State

Full title: Damon STARKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Date published: Jan 16, 2018

537 S.W.3d 404 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. ED 105138

01-16-2018

Damon STARKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

FOR APPELLANT: Alexandria A. Shah, Public Defender Office, 1010 Market St., Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101. FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Robert J. Bartholomew, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

PER CURIAM.

FOR APPELLANT: Alexandria A. Shah, Public Defender Office, 1010 Market St., Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.

FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Robert J. Bartholomew, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Damon Starks appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).