From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Starks v. Metro. Transp. Auth.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 17, 2022
20 CIVIL 9569 (MKV) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 17, 2022)

Opinion

20 CIVIL 9569 (MKV)

03-17-2022

PARTI STARKS, Plaintiff, v. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated March 17, 2022, Plaintiff cannot maintain a Title VII lawsuit against the MTA because her underlying EEOC charge was not timely filed. She also alleges insufficient facts to plausibly support a claim that the MTA acted with a discriminatory intent when it failed to promote her to Sergeant. As such, for the foregoing reasons, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice and leave to amend is DENIED; accordingly, the case is closed.


Summaries of

Starks v. Metro. Transp. Auth.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 17, 2022
20 CIVIL 9569 (MKV) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 17, 2022)
Case details for

Starks v. Metro. Transp. Auth.

Case Details

Full title:PARTI STARKS, Plaintiff, v. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 17, 2022

Citations

20 CIVIL 9569 (MKV) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 17, 2022)