From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Starks v. CSL Plasma Ctrs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 9, 2011
Civil Case No. 11-cv-00401-REB-KLM (D. Colo. Aug. 9, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Case No. 11-cv-00401-REB-KLM

08-09-2011

VICTORIA L. STARKS, Plaintiff, v. CSL PLASMA CENTERS, Defendant.


Judge Robert E. Blackburn


ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Blackburn, J.

The matter before me is the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#65], filed April 6, 2011. No objections having been filed to the recommendation, I review it only for plain error. See Morales-Fernandez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 418 F.3d 1116, 1122 (10th Cir. 2005). Finding no such error in the magistrate judge's recommended disposition, I find and conclude that the recommendation should be approved and adopted.

This standard pertains even though plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter. Morales-Fernandez, 418 F.3d at 1122. In addition, because plaintiff is proceeding pro se, I have construed her pleadings more liberally and held them to a less stringent standard than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94, 127 S. Ct. 2197, 2200, 167 L.Ed.2d 1081 (2007); Andrews v. Heaton, 483 F.3d 1070, 1076 (10th Cir. 2007); Hall v. Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991) (citing Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21, 92 S.Ct. 594, 595-96, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972)).

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

Page 2

1. That the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#20], filed June 28, 2011, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED as an order of this court;

2. That plaintiff's claims in this case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) for failure to comply with duly issued orders of the court and failure to prosecute, as detailed fully in the magistrate judge's recommendation;

3. That Defendant CSL Plasma Inc.'s Partial Motion To Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) [#13], filed May 6, 2011, is DENIED AS MOOT; and

4. That judgment SHALL ENTER on behalf of defendant, CSL Plasma, Inc., misnamed in the caption as "CSL Plasma Centers," and against plaintiff, Victoria L. Starks, as to all claims and causes of action asserted herein; provided, that judgment as to these defendants SHALL BE with prejudice.

BY THE COURT:

Robert E. Blackburn

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Starks v. CSL Plasma Ctrs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 9, 2011
Civil Case No. 11-cv-00401-REB-KLM (D. Colo. Aug. 9, 2011)
Case details for

Starks v. CSL Plasma Ctrs.

Case Details

Full title:VICTORIA L. STARKS, Plaintiff, v. CSL PLASMA CENTERS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Aug 9, 2011

Citations

Civil Case No. 11-cv-00401-REB-KLM (D. Colo. Aug. 9, 2011)