From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Starkey v. Cameron

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 13, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-5891 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 13, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-5891.

January 13, 2011


ORDER


AND NOW, this 13th day of Jan., 2010, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge L. Felipe Restrepo, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED as time-barred;

3. A certificate of appealability should not issue since, for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, petitioner has failed to show that a reasonable jurist could conclude that the Court is incorrect in dismissing the petition as time-barred.


Summaries of

Starkey v. Cameron

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 13, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-5891 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Starkey v. Cameron

Case Details

Full title:VINCENT STARKEY v. KENNETH R. CAMERON, et al

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 13, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-5891 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 13, 2011)