From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Starkes v. Haile

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 16, 2007
No. CIV S-05-2275 DFL GGH P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-2275 DFL GGH P.

March 16, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On November 21, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 21, 2006 are adopted in full; and

2. Defendants' motion to dismiss filed August 10, 2006, is denied; defendants shall file an answer to the second amended complaint within twenty days of the date of this order.


Summaries of

Starkes v. Haile

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 16, 2007
No. CIV S-05-2275 DFL GGH P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2007)
Case details for

Starkes v. Haile

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY STARKES, Plaintiff, v. DR. HAILE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 16, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-05-2275 DFL GGH P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2007)