From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stark v. Triangle Car Limousine Service

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 24, 1998
248 A.D.2d 283 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

March 24, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Salvador Collazo, J.).


The motion was properly denied, there being issues of fact as to which defendant was the driver's actual employer, the full amount of applicable insurance coverage in effect at the time of the accident, and whether plaintiff was induced by false statements concerning the available insurance coverage to sign a general release settling his claim against the driver and the car's registered owner. We have considered defendants' other arguments, including that plaintiff is impermissibly splitting his cause of actions, and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Stark v. Triangle Car Limousine Service

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 24, 1998
248 A.D.2d 283 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Stark v. Triangle Car Limousine Service

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT STARK, Respondent, v. TRIANGLE CAR LIMOUSINE SERVICE, INC., Doing…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 24, 1998

Citations

248 A.D.2d 283 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
670 N.Y.S.2d 75