From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Starbucks Corp. v. Hitman Glass, Corp.

United States District Court Central District of California
Oct 21, 2016
Case No. 2:16-CV-03937-ODW(PJW) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 2:16-CV-03937-ODW(PJW)

10-21-2016

STARBUCKS CORPORATION d/b/a STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY, a Washington corporation Plaintiff, v. HITMAN GLASS, a California corporation; JAMES LANDGRAF, an individual residing in Oregon; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

On June 3, 2016, Plaintiff Starbucks Corporation filed this action against Defendants Hitman Glass and James Landgraf for trademark dilution, copyright infringement, trademark infringement, and false designation of origin. (ECF No. 1.) On August 31, 2016 the Clerk of Court entered a default against Defendant James Landgraf. (ECF No. 26.) On October 20, 2016, this Court granted Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant James Landgraf. (ECF No. 37.) / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /

In accordance with that Order, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows:

1. Defendant James Landgraf is liable for Plaintiff's claims of trademark dilution, copyright infringement, trademark infringement, and false designation of origin;

2. Plaintiff shall recover from Defendant James Landgraf the sum of Four Hundred Ten Thousand Five Hundred and Eighty dollars ($410,580) in damages.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

October 21, 2016

/s/ _________

OTIS D. WRIGHT, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Starbucks Corp. v. Hitman Glass, Corp.

United States District Court Central District of California
Oct 21, 2016
Case No. 2:16-CV-03937-ODW(PJW) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2016)
Case details for

Starbucks Corp. v. Hitman Glass, Corp.

Case Details

Full title:STARBUCKS CORPORATION d/b/a STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY, a Washington…

Court:United States District Court Central District of California

Date published: Oct 21, 2016

Citations

Case No. 2:16-CV-03937-ODW(PJW) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2016)