From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stanton v. McDaniel

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Jan 17, 2008
3:05-cv-00419-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. Jan. 17, 2008)

Opinion

3:05-cv-00419-LRH-RAM.

January 17, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, through counsel, has filed a motion for an extension of time in which to file a reply to respondents' answer. (Docket #59). Petitioner seeks a 60-day enlargement of time, up to and including March 22, 2008, to file a reply. Having reviewed the motion and good cause appearing, petitioner's motion is granted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's motion for an extension of time to file a reply (Docket #59) is GRANTED. Petitioner's reply shall be filed on or before March 22, 2008.


Summaries of

Stanton v. McDaniel

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Jan 17, 2008
3:05-cv-00419-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. Jan. 17, 2008)
Case details for

Stanton v. McDaniel

Case Details

Full title:JUSTIN REATA STANTON, Petitioner, v. E.K. McDANIEL, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Jan 17, 2008

Citations

3:05-cv-00419-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. Jan. 17, 2008)