Opinion
No. 193 MAL 2003
April 6, 2004, Decided
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 6th day of April, 2004, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following issue:
Did the Superior Court improperly conclude that Pennsylvania Power and Light Company was an "owner" of land entitled to protection under the Recreational Use of Land and Water Act, 68 P.S. §§ 477-1-477-8, where it held only an easement?