From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stanton v. King

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 21, 1879
76 N.Y. 585 (N.Y. 1879)

Opinion

Argued December 16, 1878

Decided January 21, 1879

Philip S. Crook for appellant.

James C. Hays for respondent.



FOLGER, J., reads for modification by inserting before the words " striking out," the words " so far as," and by striking out the word " dismissed," and inserting in lieu thereof this phrase, viz.: " stricken out;" and by striking out the words " and from entering" and inserting in lieu thereof, the words " so as to enter;" and by reducing the amount of costs allowed to twenty dollars, for making motion in Special Term, and for one appeal to General Term. And as modified, order affirmed, without costs to either party against the other in this court.

All concur, except RAPALLO, who is for reversal of order so far as it stays proceedings in this action, and ANDREWS, J., absent at argument.

Ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

Stanton v. King

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 21, 1879
76 N.Y. 585 (N.Y. 1879)
Case details for

Stanton v. King

Case Details

Full title:PHILIP V.R. STANTON, Appellant, v . ELIZABETH R.B. KING, Impleaded, etc.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 21, 1879

Citations

76 N.Y. 585 (N.Y. 1879)

Citing Cases

Piedmont Hotel Co. v. Nettleton Co.

The defendant suggests that if plaintiff is now permitted to discontinue its action it may bring suit in…

Brassington v. Rohrs

The appellant, upon a single notice of appeal to this court, brought up for review (1) the judgment of the…