From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stanton v. Ekeke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
Mar 20, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16cv409 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 20, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16cv409

03-20-2019

LUKE ADAM STANTON, SR. v. GRACE N. EKEKE


ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Luke Adam Stanton, Sr., proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled lawsuit. The Court previously referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for consideration pursuant to applicable orders of this court.

Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction (doc. no. 15). The Magistrate Judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge recommending the motion be denied.

The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record and pleadings. No objections were filed to the Report and Recommendation.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. The motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction is DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED March 20, 2019.

/s/_________

Ron Clark, Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Stanton v. Ekeke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
Mar 20, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16cv409 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 20, 2019)
Case details for

Stanton v. Ekeke

Case Details

Full title:LUKE ADAM STANTON, SR. v. GRACE N. EKEKE

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION

Date published: Mar 20, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16cv409 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 20, 2019)