From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stansbury v. Ehrlich

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Oct 30, 2014
102 A.3d 420 (Pa. 2014)

Opinion

No. 138 EM 2014.

10-30-2014

Kareem J. STANSBURY, Petitioner v. Hon. Judge Charles EHRLICH, Assistant D.A., Defense Counsel Evan T.L. Hughes, Respondents.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 30th day of October, 2014, the Petition for Review and the Application for Emergency Relief are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453 (1994) (hybrid representation improper). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record and strike the name of the jurist from the caption.


Summaries of

Stansbury v. Ehrlich

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Oct 30, 2014
102 A.3d 420 (Pa. 2014)
Case details for

Stansbury v. Ehrlich

Case Details

Full title:KAREEM J. STANSBURY, Petitioner v. HON. JUDGE CHARLES EHRLICH, ASSISTANT…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Oct 30, 2014

Citations

102 A.3d 420 (Pa. 2014)
628 Pa. 12