From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stansberry v. Alaska Court Sys.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jan 10, 2023
No. C22-1664JLR-SKV (W.D. Wash. Jan. 10, 2023)

Opinion

C22-1664JLR-SKV

01-10-2023

LEE ROY J. STANSBERRY, Plaintiff, v. ALASKA COURT SYSTEM, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

JAMES L. ROBART, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On December 30, 2022, the court notified pro se Plaintiff Lee Roy J. Stansberry that he had failed to timely pay the $402.00 filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (See 12/30/22 OSC (Dkt. # 7); see also Deficiency Notice (Dkt. # 5); Dkt.) Therefore, the court ordered Mr. Stansberry to show cause why his case should not be dismissed. (12/30/22 OSC at 2.) Alternatively, the court stated that Mr. Stansberry could discharge the show cause order by “either pay[ing] the $402 filing fee or submit[ing] an IFP application” by January 9, 2023. (Id.) The court warned Mr. Stansberry that his failure to timely respond to the court's show cause order would “result in dismissal of this action without prejudice.” (Id.)

The January 9, 2023 deadline has now passed, and Mr. Stansberry has neither responded to the court's show cause orders nor cured the deficiencies identified therein. (See generally Dkt.) Accordingly, the court DISMISSES this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE.


Summaries of

Stansberry v. Alaska Court Sys.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jan 10, 2023
No. C22-1664JLR-SKV (W.D. Wash. Jan. 10, 2023)
Case details for

Stansberry v. Alaska Court Sys.

Case Details

Full title:LEE ROY J. STANSBERRY, Plaintiff, v. ALASKA COURT SYSTEM, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Jan 10, 2023

Citations

No. C22-1664JLR-SKV (W.D. Wash. Jan. 10, 2023)