From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stanow v. Beaumont Ctr. for Pain Med.

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Nov 25, 2020
950 N.W.2d 746 (Mich. 2020)

Opinion

SC: 161601 161602 COA: 346641 347275

11-25-2020

Gilbert STANOW, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BEAUMONT CENTER FOR PAIN MEDICINE, an assumed name FOR WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellant, and Sean Conroy, M.D. and American Anesthesiology of Michigan, P.C., Defendants-Appellees.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 17, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Zahra, J. (dissenting).

I would grant leave to appeal to consider whether the factors from Vicencio v. Jaime Ramirez, M.D., P.C. , 211 Mich. App. 501, 507, 536 N.W.2d 280 (1995), were appropriately applied in the dismissal analysis under MCR 2.504 in light of Maldonado v. Ford Motor Co. , 476 Mich. 372, 395 n. 24, 719 N.W.2d 809 (2006).


Summaries of

Stanow v. Beaumont Ctr. for Pain Med.

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Nov 25, 2020
950 N.W.2d 746 (Mich. 2020)
Case details for

Stanow v. Beaumont Ctr. for Pain Med.

Case Details

Full title:GILBERT STANOW, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BEAUMONT CENTER FOR PAIN MEDICINE…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Nov 25, 2020

Citations

950 N.W.2d 746 (Mich. 2020)